Science Fiction and Economic Cycles. A Dialogue on Technological Expectations

Authors

  • Daniele Archibugi Italian National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies
  • Bengt-Ã…ke Lundvall Department of Business and Management, The Faculty of Social Sciences University
  • Edward Steinmueller SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, Business and Management, School of Business, Management and Economics, Sussex University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.90.2016

Keywords:

Technological opportunities, Techno-­‐economic paradigms, Social acceptability, Regulatory regimes, Schumpeterian Economics, Creative destruction, Information technology, Bio-­‐technology, Base and super-­‐structure, Social innovation

Abstract

Was the 2007-8 financial and economic crisis brought about by the exhaustion of the current techno-economic paradigm, and will a new paradigm will lead to eventual recovery? Lundvall and Steinmueller respond to Archibugi’s Blade Runner economics. Lundvall argues that whilst it is useful to think in terms of techno-economic paradigms to understand the uneven process of technological and social advancement, the main reason for the crisis and the main requirement for a new upswing are both socio-political rather than technological in nature. There is a link between the neoliberal deregulation regime that led to the crisis and ICTs. This regime might actually slow down the formation of a new techno-economic paradigm based around genetic engineering, artificial intelligence and nanotechnology. Steinmueller discusses what role science fiction might play in developing insights about possible futures. Might the present day equivalent for techno-economic paradigm change be more about the innovations necessary to rebuild or retrofit our existing technologies than about producing new growth sectors? Taking on board these insights, Archibugi contends that we need to understand why the economic crisis has been so long, so deep and so wide. An innovation-based recovery will need to take advantage of technological opportunities. Pro-active public intervention in science and technology will additionally be required, combined with new social imagination.

References

Archibugi, D. 2008. The Global Commonwealth of Citizens. Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Archibugi, D. 2016. Blade Runner economics: will innovation lead the economic recovery?, Research Policy, forthcoming.

Archibugi, D. and Filippetti A. 2016. The Retreat of Public Research and its Adverse Consequences on Innovation. CIMR Research Working Paper Series N. 31, Birkbeck College, University of London.

Archibugi, D., A. Filippetti and M. Frenz (2013). "Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?" Research Policy 42(3): 303- 314.

Archibugi, D., A. Filippetti and M. Frenz (2013). "The impact of the economic crisis on innovation: evidence from Europe." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(7): 1247-1260.

Archibugi, D., Filippetti A. eds., 2015. The Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation. Oxford, Wiley, 2015

Arundel A., Lorenz E., Lundvall, B.-Å. and Valeyre A. (2007), ‘How Europe's economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 16, no. 6, pp??.

Battelle, 2016. Global R&D Funding Forecast. R&D Magazine, Winter.

Brautigan, R. (1968). All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace. The Pill versus The Springhill Mine Disaster. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Dabrowski, M. (2010). "The global financial crisis: Lessons for European integration." Economic Systems 34(1): 38-54.

David, P.A. (1990), ‘The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review, 80(2, Papers and Proceedings), 355-361.

Dorn, J.A. (1993), ‘Financial Deregulation in a Global Economy’, Cato Journal 13(2), 155–164.

Evangelista, R. and Vezzani, A. 2010. The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations. A firm-level analysis, Research Policy, 39(10), 1253–1263.

Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson R. eds, 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Filippetti, A. 2010. Harnessing the ‘Essential Tension’ of Design: The Complex Relationship between the Firm and Designer Consultants. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1586958 orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1586958

Freeman, C. (1984), ‘Prometheus unbound’, Futures, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 494-507.

Freeman, C. 2001. A hard landing for the ‘New Economy’? Information technology and the United States national system of innovation, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 12(2), 115–139.

Freeman, C. and Louçã, F. 2001. As Time Goes By. From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Gallouj, F., Savona, M., 2009. Innovation in services: a review of the debate and a research agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19 (2), 149-172.

Gordon, R. (2012), Is U.S. economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds. NBER Working Paper No. 18315, Cambridge, MA, August.

Gordon, R. 2016. The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Gordon, R. J. (2016). The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/disruptive_technologies accessed by the author March 21 2016.

Iammarino, S. and McCann, P. 2013. Multinationals and Economic Geography. Location, Technology and Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Jensen, M.B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., and Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007), ‘Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation’, Research Policy, vol. 36, nr. 5, June, pp??.

Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.-Ã…. (2002), ‘Why all this fuss about codiï¬ed and tacit knowledge?’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.11, pp. 245–262.

Kindleberger, C. 1978. Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A history of financial crises. Basic Books, New York.

Lee K (2013), Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catchup: Knowledge, Path-creation, and the Middle-income Trap. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lundvall, B.-Ã…. (1991), 'Innovation, the organised market and the productivity slow-down', in OECD, Technology and Productivity, The Challenge for Economic Policy, OECD, Paris, pp. 447-458.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (2009), ‘Why the new economy is a learning economy’, in Dreschler, W., Reinert, E. S. & Kattel, R. (eds.), Techno-Economic Paradigms. Essays in Honour of Carlota Perez, Anthem Press.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (2011), ‘The changing global knowledge landscape - The need for a transatlantic vision and a new pragmatism’. In Hamilton, D. and Volker, K., (eds.), Transatlantic 2020: A tale of four futures, Washington : Center for Transatlantic Relations, pp. 287-311.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (2013), ‘The 'new new deal' as a response to the euro-crisis’, in Benner, B. (ed.), Before and Beyond the Global Economic Crisis: Economics, Politics and Settlement, Edward Elgar Publishing Incorporated, pp. 151-172.

Lundvall, B.Ã…. 2016. Is there a technological fix for the current global stagnation. A Response to Daniele Archibugi, Research Policy, forthcoming.

Lundvall, B.-Å. and Lorenz, E. (2014), ‘The euro crisis and the failure of the Lisbon strategy’. In Teixeira, A.A.C., Silva, E.G and Mamede, R.P., Structural Change, Competitiveness and Industrial Policy: Painful lessons from the European periphery, Oxon, UK, Routledge, pp. 80-101.

Lundvall, B.Ã…., Joseph, K.J., Chaminade, C., Vang, J., eds., 2009. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Marx, K. 1859/1977. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Progress Publishers, Moscow.

Mazzucato, M. (2015). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. New York: PublicAffairs (Perseus).

Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State. Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press, London.

Mazzucato, M. and C. Perez (2015). Innovation as Growth Policy: The Challenge for Europe. The Triple Challenge for Europe: Economic Development, Climate Change, and Governance. J. Fagerberg, S. Laestadius and B. R. Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 229-264.

Ministry of Higher Education and Science (2016), An OECD Horizon Scan of Megatrends and Technology Trends in the Context of Future Research Policy, Copenhagen.

Mokyr, J. (2013), ‘Is technological progress a thing of the past?’, Vox. CEPR’s Policy Portal, 8 September, at http://www.voxeu.org/article/technological-progress-thing-past (accessed on ???).

Mokyr, J., Strotz, R.H., Vickers, C., Ziebarth, N.L. 2015. The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3): 31–50.

Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., Hamdouch, A., eds., 2013. The International Handbook on Social Innovation Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Chelthenam, Edward Elgar.

Nelson, R. R. 1977. The Moon and the Ghetto: An Essay on Public Policy Analysis. W. W. Norton & Company, New York.

Nelson, R. R. 2011. The Moon and the Ghetto revisited. Science and Public Policy 38(9): 681-690.

Perez, C. (2013), ‘Unleashing a golden age after the ï¬nancial collapse: Drawing lessons from history’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 9–23.

Perez, C. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Perez, C. and Soete, L. (1988), “Catching up in technology entry barriers and windows of opportunityâ€, in Dosi, G. et al., (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp??.

Pisano, G. P. (2006), Science Business: The promise, the reality, and the future of biotechnology, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA.

Revoltella, D., Brutscher, P.-B., Tsiotras, A., Weiss, C. 2016, Infrastructure Investment in Europe and International Competitiveness. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank Working Papers 2016/01.

Sahlman WA, 1999. The new economy is stronger than you think. Harvard Business Review, 77(6): 99-106.

Schot, J. (2016). "Confronting the Second Deep Transition through the Historical Imagination." Technology and Culture 57(2 (April)): 445-456.

Sherman, M. (2009), ‘A Short History of Financial Deregulation in the United States.’, Report, July 2009. Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC.

Smith, K. 2005. Measuring Innovation. In Fagerberg et al., 2005.

Steinmueller, W.E. 2016. Science Fiction and innovation: A Response, Research Policy, forthcoming.

Summers, L. H. (2016). "The Age of Secular Stagnation." Foreign Affairs 95(2): 2-9.

Tylecote, A. 1992. The Long Wave in the World Economy. The Current Crisis in Historical Perspective. Routledge, London.

Zhou, P., Li, J. 2015. Is the World of Science Moving to the East What Bibliometrics Says, pp.109-123 in Archibugi and Filippetti, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-02

How to Cite

Archibugi, D., Lundvall, B.- Ã…ke, & Steinmueller, E. (2016). Science Fiction and Economic Cycles. A Dialogue on Technological Expectations. IRPPS Working Papers, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.90.2016

Issue

IRPPS WPs pubblicati nel 2016

Section

Working Papers

License

This licence lets others distribute, remix and build upon a work, even commercially, as long as they credit the original creator/s (and any other nominated parties). This is the most accommodating of the licences in terms of what others can do with the work.