The Retreat of Public Research and its Adverse Consequences on Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.94.2016Keywords:
R&D, Knowledge economy, Public sector, Public goods, Intellectual property, Technology transferAbstract
Does it matter whether research is conducted by the private business rather than in universities or government research centres? While most of the attention of science and innovation policy in the last decades has explored the relevance of the interconnections between public and business players in enhancing knowledge-based societies, a major trend has been ignored: both the quota of public R&D and its share over the total R&D investment has shrunk in most OECD countries. As a result, a larger fraction of knowledge is today generated in the private sector. We argue that this is a major problem since public research and private research differ along a number of characteristics, e.g. public access, potential for future technological innovations, criteria of resource allocation. This trend can have adverse implications for long-term innovation and economic welfare in our societies. Through the lens of the public goods theory and of the sector of funding and execution of R&D for the period 1981-2012 we try to explain why.References
Antonelli, C., Crespi, F., Scellato, G. 2012. Inside innovation persistence: New evidence from Italian micro-data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23, 4, 341–353
Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (eds.), 2015a. The Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation. Wiley, Oxford
Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. 2015b. Knowledge as a global public good. Pp. 479-503 in Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation. Wiley, Oxford
Arrow, K., 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in: Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of the Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Arundel, A., 2001. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy 30, 611–624.
Balconi, M., Brusoni, S., Orsenigo, L., 2010. In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy 39, 1–13.
Boyle, J., 2003. The second enclosures movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66, 33–74.
Bozeman, B., 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy 29, 627–655.
Callon, M., 1994. Is science a public good? Science, Technology, & Human Values 19, 395–424.
Cantwell, J., Molero, J., eds., 2003. Multinational Corporations, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Glos.
Caraça, J., Lundvall, B.-Å., Mendonça, S., 2009. The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76, 861–867.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., 2008. Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152.
Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552.
Colombo, MG, Grilli, L, Piscitello L., eds., 2011. Science and Innovation Policy for the New Knowledge Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Conceicao, P., Heitor, M.V., Sirilli, G., Wilson, R., 2004. The “Swing of Pendulum†from public to market support for science and technology: is the U.S. leading the way? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 71, 553–578.
Cowan, R., David, P.A., Foray, D., 2000. The explicit economics of knowledge. codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 212–253.
Cowen, T. 2002. Creative Destruction: How Globalization Is Changing the World's Cultures. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Crespi F. Quatraro, F., 2012. Systemic technology policies: Issues and instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 8, 1447–1449.
Dasgupta, P., David, P.A., 1994. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23, 487–521.
David, P.A., 2004. Can “open science†be protected from the evolving regime of IPR protections? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 160, 9–34.
David, P.A., 1997. From market magic to calypso science policy. A review of Terence Kealey’s The economic laws of scientific research. Research Policy 26, 229–255.
David, P.A., Hall, B., Toole, A.A., 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29, 497–529.
Deiaco, E., Hughes, A., McKelvey, M., 2012. Universities as strategic actors in the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36, 525–541.
De Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., de la Potterie, B. van P., 2013. The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy 42, 720–737.
D’Este, P., Guy, F., Iammarino, S., 2013. Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: what type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography 13, 537–558.
Dinges, M., Berger, M., Frietsch, R., Kaloudis, A., 2007. Monitoring sector specialisation of public and private funded business research and development. Science and Public Policy 34, 431–443.
Dosi, G., Stiglitz, J.E., 2013. The role of intellectual property rights in the development process. LEM Working Paper Series November.
Drazen, A., Grilli, V., 1993. The benefit of crises for economic reforms. The American Economic Review 83, 598–607.
Economic Insight, 2015. What is the relationship between public and private investment in science, research and innovation? A Report commissioned by the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. London.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2†to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29, 109–123.
Faulkner, W., Senker, J., Velho, L., 1995. Knowledge frontiers. Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Fenner, F., Henderson, D.A., Arita, I., Jezek, Z., Ladnyi, I.D., others, 1988. Smallpox and its Eradication. WHO, Geneva.
Filippetti, A., Archibugi, D., 2011. Innovation in times of crisis: National System of Innovation, structure and demand. Research Policy 40, 179–192.
Gander, J.P., 1986. The economics of university-industry research linkages. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 29, 33–49.
Geuna, A., Rossi, F., 2011. Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy 40, 1068–1076.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London.
Gillies, D., 2015. Serendipity and Chance in Scientific Discovery. Pp. 525–539 in: Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.
Godin, B., 2006. The linear model of innovation. Science, Technology & Human Values 31, 639–667.
Gordon, R.J., 2012. Is U.S. Economic Growth Over? Faltering Innovation Confronts the Six Headwinds. (Working Paper No. 18315). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D.S., Wright, M., 2011. 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy 40, 1045–1057.
Guellec, D., Potterie, B.V.P.D.L., 2003. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12, 225–243.
Havas, A., 2008. Devising futures for universities in a multi-level structure: A methodological experiment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75, 558–582.
Heitor, M., 2015. How university global partnerships may facilitate a new era of international affairs and foster political and economic relations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 95, 276–293.
Heller, M.A., Eisenberg, R.S., 1998. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science 280, 698–701.
Hennemann, S., Liefner, I. 2015. Global Science Collaboration. Pp. 343-363 in D. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation. Wiley, Oxford.
Hess, C., Ostrom, E., 2006. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. The Mit Press, Cambridge MA.
Hsu, D.W.L., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B.J.C., Chou, C.J., 2015. Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 92, 25–39.
Iammarino, S., McCann, P., 2013. Multinationals and Economic Geography: Location, Technology and Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Iammarino, S., McCann, P., 2013. Multinational enterprises Innovative Networks and the role of cities. Pp. 290-312 in D. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation. Wiley, Oxford.
Kealey, T., 1996. The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. Cambridge Univ Press.
KIK Innoenergy, 2015. Top 10 Energy Innovators in 100 Energy Priorities. Accessible at http://www.kic-innoenergy.com/top-10-energy-innovators-in-100-energy-priorities/.
Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24, 185–205.
Kline, S.J., Rosenberg, N., 1986. An Overview of Innovation, in: Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Lane, C., Probert, J., 2007. The external sourcing of technological knowledge by US pharmaceutical companies: Strategic goals and interâ€organizational relationships. Industry & Innovation 14, 5–25. doi:10.1080/13662710601130574
Lawton Smith, H., Bagchi-Sen, S., 2010. Triple helix and regional development: a perspective from Oxfordshire in the UK. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22, 805–818.
Le Goff, J.M., 2011. The impact of CERN on high tech industry developments. Focus: The construction of the LHC. Presented at the Workshop: Research infrastructures for industrial innovation, European Commission, Brussels.
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R., Winter, S. (1987) 'Appropriating the returns from industrial Research and Development', Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 3, 783-381.
Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., 1996. Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy 23, 279–286.
Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., Sanditov, B., 2008. Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation 17, 87–102.
Mazzucato, M., 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press, London.
Megginson, W.I., Netter, J. M., 2001. From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321-389
M.I.T., 2015. The Future Postponed. Why Declining Investment in Basic Research Threatens a U.S. Innovation Deficit. M.I.T. Washington Office, Washington D.C.
Narula, R., Martinez-Noya, A. 2015. International R&D Alliances by Firms: Origins and Development. Pp., 144-170 in D. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation. Wiley, Oxford.
Nelson, R.R., 1989. What is private and what is public about technology? Science Technology Human Values 14, 229–241.
Nielsen, M., 2012. Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
OECD. 2015. Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Frascati Manual. OECD, Paris.
Orac, 2015. The “myth†of basic science? at Scienceblog at http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2015/10/27/the-myth-of-basic-science/, 27 October.
Ostrom, V., Ostrom, E., 1999. Public goods and public choices. Pp. 75–105 in Ed. McGinnis, M. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Pavitt, K., 1993. What do firms learn from basic research. Pp. 29–40 in Foray, D. and Freeman, C. (eds.), Technology and the Wealth of Nations. Pinter Publishers, London.
Pavitt, K., 1987. The Objectives of Technology Policy. Science and Public Policy 14, 182–188.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., 2013. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy 42, 423–442.
Polanyi, M., 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York.
Ridley, M., 2015. The Myth of Basic Science. Wall Street Journal, 23 October.
Rosenberg, N. 1990. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy 19(2), 165-174
Rosenberg, N., 1991. Critical issues in science policy research. Science and Public Policy 18, 335–346.
Rosenberg, N., Nelson, R.R., 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research policy 23, 323–348.
Rossi, F., Rosli, A., 2015. Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: evidence from the United Kingdom. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1970-1991.
Salter, A.J., Martin, B.R., 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy 30, 509–532.
Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., Meissner, D., 2015. Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, forthcoming, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.032
Slaughter, S., Leslie, L.L., 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Stiglitz, J., 1999. Knowledge as a public good. Pp. 308–325 in: Stern, M., I. Kaul, Grunberg, I. (eds.), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press, New York.
Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B., 2008. Europe’s R&D: missing the wrong targets? Intereconomics 43, 220–225.
Von Hippel, E., 1987. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16, 291–302.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
 | This licence lets others distribute, remix and build upon a work, even commercially, as long as they credit the original creator/s (and any other nominated parties). This is the most accommodating of the licences in terms of what others can do with the work. |
