Exploratory time‐trend analysis of ‘electrical engineering’ and chemical technological domains patents in Brazil: lessons for developing countries

Authors

  • Tulio Chiarini National Institute of Technology (INT)
  • Marcia Rapini Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)
  • Thiago Caliari Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL)
  • Leonardo Costa Ribeiro National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.99.2017

Keywords:

IPRs, TNCs, Development

Abstract

This paper presents data on the patenting practice in Brazil and contributes to the understanding of some characteristics of the Brazilian National System of Innovation that possibly other countries with the same level of industrial development share with it. In particular, the paper throws some light on the fact that in Brazil there is a dominant share of patents on the hands of non-residents, almost all non-residents are transnational companies (TNCs) and most of them are from the USA, Western Europe and Japan. Besides this, we show that indigenous companies’ strategies are not straight forwardly translated into patents and those indigenous companies, which were acquired by TNCs, reduced their patenting activities. This article focuses on ‘electrical engineering’ technological domain – electrical components, audiovisual, telecommunications, information technology and semiconductors – and ‘chemical’ technological domain – organic fine chemicals, macromolecular chemistry, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, and biotechnology – using data from PATSTAT.

References

Akyuz, Yilmaz (2005). “Impasses do desenvolvimentoâ€. Novos Estudos CEBRAP no. 72:41-58.

Albuquerque Motta, Eduardo (1999). “National systems of innovation and non-OCED countries: notes about a rudimentary and tentative ‘tipology’â€. Revista de Economia Política no. 19 (4):35-52.

Albuquerque Motta, Eduardo (2000). “Domestic patents and developing countries: arguments for their study and data from Brazil (1980–1995)â€. Research Policy no. 29 (9):1047-1060.

Archibugi, Daniele, Filippetti, Andrea (2010). “The Globalisation of Intellectual Property Rights: Four Learned Lessons and Four Thesesâ€. Global Policy no. 1 (2).

Archibugi, Daniele, Filippetti, Andrea (2015). “Editors’ Introduction: Science, Technology, and Innovation go globalâ€. In The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation, edited by Daniele Archibugi and Andrea Filippetti. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Archibugi, Daniele, Pietrobelli, Carlo (2003). “The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries Windows of opportunity or further burden?†Technological Forecasting & Social Change no. 70.

Caliari, Thiago, Mazzoleni, Roberto, Martins Costa Póvoa, Luciano (2013). “Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry in Brazil post-TRIPSâ€. In TRIPS compliance, National Patente Regimes and Innovation. Evidences and Experiences from Developing Countries, edited by Sunil Mani and Richard R. Nelson, 16-56. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Caliari, Thiago, Machado Ruiz, Ricardo (2013). “Brazilian pharmaceutical industry and generic drugs policy: impacts on structure and innovation and recent developmentsâ€. Science & Public Policy:1-12.

Chang, Ha-Joon (2003). “Trade and Industrial Policy Issuesâ€. In Rethinking Development Economics, edited by Ha-Joon Chang, 257-276. London: Anthem Press.

Chang, Ha-Joon (2004). Chutando a escada: a estratégia do desenvolvimento em perspectiva histórica. São Paulo: Editora da UNESP.

Chang, Ha-Joon (2009). Maus samaritanos: o mito do livre-comércio e a história secreta do capitalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Chesnais, François (2010). “National systems of innovation, foreign direct investment and operations of multinational enterprisesâ€. In National Systems of Innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning, edited by Bengt Ã…ke Lundvall, 259-292. New York: Anthem Press.

Chiarini, Tulio, Siqueira Rapini, Marcia, Alves Silva, Leandro (2016). “Access to knowledge and catch-up: Exploring some IPRs data from Brazil and South Koreaâ€. Science & Public Policy:1-16. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw034

Chiarini, Tulio, Gonçalves Silva, Ana Lucia (2016). “Intellectual property rights and innovation system: Some lessons from Brazilâ€. International Journal of Innovation and Learning no. 20 (3):265-288.

Conceição, Pedro, Gibson, David V., Heitor, Manuel V., Sirilli, Giorgio (2001). “Knowledge for Inclusive Development: The Challenge of Globally Integrated Learning and Implications for Science and Technology Policyâ€. Technological Forecasting & Social Change no. 66 (1):1-29.

Filippetti, Andrea, Archibugi, Daniele (2015). “The globalization of intellectual property rightsâ€. In The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation, edited by Daniele Archibugi and Andrea Filippetti, 421-442. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Furtado, André, Quadros Carvalho, Ruy (2005). “Patterns of technological intensity in Brazilian industry: a comparative study with developed countriesâ€. Innovation: Management, policy & practice no. 7 (2-3):152-171.

Gielfi, Giovanna G., Furtado, André, Tijssen, Robert J. W. (2016). R&D funding policy and university-industry research collaboration: the case of Petrobras. In 14th International Globelics Conference. Bandung (Indonesia).

Helpman, Elhanan (1992). Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights. In Working paper 4081. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ietto-Gillies, Grazia (2012). Transnational Corporations and International Production. Concepts, theories and effects. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Ietto-Gillies, Grazia (2015). “Innovation, internationalization, and the transnational corporationâ€. In The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation, edited by Daniele Archibugi and Andrea Filippetti, 127-143. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Kim, Yee Kyoung, Lee, Keun, Park, Walter G., Chood, Kineung (2012). “Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of developmentâ€. Research Policy no. 41 (2):358-375.

Lai, Edwin L.-C. (1998). “International Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Rate of Product Innovationâ€. Journal of Development Economics no. 55:133-153.

Lai, Edwin L.-C. (2007). “The Theory of International Policy Coordination in the Protection of Ideasâ€. In Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade (Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, Volume 2), edited by Keith E. Maskus. Hungary: Elsevier.

Lall, Sanjaya (2003). “Indicators of the relative importance of IPRs in developing countriesâ€. Research Policy no. 32:1657-1680.

Mansfield, Edwin, Schwartz, Mark, Wagner, Samuel (1981). “Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Studyâ€. The Economic Journal no. 91 (364):907-918.

Mazzoleni, Roberto, Nelson, Richard R. (1998a). “The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debateâ€. Research Policy no. 27:273-284.

Mazzoleni, Roberto, Nelson, Richard R. (1998b). “Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patentsâ€. Journal of Economic Issues no. 32 (4):1031-1052.

Mazzoleni, Roberto, Póvoa, Luciano Martins Costa (2010). “Accumulation of technological capabilities and economic development. Did Brazil'sIPR regime matter?†In Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-up. An International Comparative Study, edited by Hiroyuki Odagiri, Akira Goto, Atsushi Sunami and Richard R. Nelson, 280-314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Moed, Henk F., Glanzel,Wolfgang, Schmoch, Ulrich (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Niosi, Jorge (2012). Innovation and development through imitation (In praise of imitation). In International Schumpeter Society. Brisbane (Australia) Patel, Pari, Pavitt, Keith (1997). “The technological competences of the world’s largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much varietyâ€. Research Policy no. 26:141-156.

Penrose, Edith (1973). “International Patenting and the Less-Developed Countriesâ€. The Economic Journal no. 83 (331):768-786.

Rapini, Marcia Siqueira, Chiarini, Tulio, Bittencourt, Pablo Felipe (2016). “Obstacles to innovation in Brazil: The lack of qualified individuals to implement innovation and establish university–firm interactionsâ€. Industry and Higher Education no. Forthcoming.

Sell, Susan (2004). “Intellectual Property and Public Policy in Historical Perspective: Contestation and Settlementâ€. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review no. 38:267-321.

Suzigan, Wilson, Furtado, João (2006). “Política industrial e desenvolvimentoâ€. Revista de Economia Política no. 26 (2):163-185.

Tigre, Paulo, Bastos, Caio, Machado, Victor, do Nascimento, França, Costa, Laís Silveira (2016). “Windows of opportunities and technological innovation in the Brazilian pharmaceutical industryâ€. Cadernos de Saúde Pública no. 32 (2):S1-S12.

Turchi, Lenita, Porto, Geciane (2013). “A PETROBRAS e ICTs: a construção das parceriasâ€. In Impactos Tecnológicos das Parcerias da PETROBRAS com Universidades, Centros de Pesquisa e Firmas Brasileiras, edited by Lenita Maria Turchi, Fernanda Negri and JOoão Alberto Negri, 43-80. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA).

Vaitsos, Constantine (1972). “Patents revisited: Their function in developing countriesâ€. The Journal of Development Studies no. 9 (1):71-97.

Zheng, Jia, Zhao, Zhiyun, Zhang, Xu, Huang, Mu-hsuan, Chen, Dar-zen (2014). “Influences of counting methods on country rankings: a perspective from patent analysisâ€. Scientometrics no. 98 (3):2087-2102.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-19

How to Cite

Chiarini, T., Rapini, M., Caliari, T., & Ribeiro, L. C. (2017). Exploratory time‐trend analysis of ‘electrical engineering’ and chemical technological domains patents in Brazil: lessons for developing countries. IRPPS Working Papers, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.99.2017

Issue

Section

Working Papers