Ideazione e implementazione di uno studio Delphi online per lo sviluppo di indicatori di evidenceâ€informed policy making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.88.2016Parole chiave:
evidenceâ€informed policy making, Delphi, indicatoriAbstract
Questo report descrive lo studio Delphi condotto nell’ambito del progetto europeo FP7 REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity (REPOPA), che si pone come obiettivo principale quello di favorire l’uso delle evidenze scientifiche nelle politiche riguardanti la salute e l’attività fisica. Lo studio Delphi è stato ideato e implementato con lo scopo di integrare e validare una lista di indicatori di evidenceinformed policy making sviluppata dai ricercatori REPOPA per valutare l’uso di evidenze nei processi di policy, divisi per set tematici. Lo studio ha visto il coinvolgimento di 76 ricercatori e policy makers di sei paesi europei – Italia, Romania, Danimarca, Finlandia, Regno Unito e Olanda – e organizzazioni internazionali e si è svolto in due fasi: due questionari online per valutare rilevanza e fattibilità degli indicatori. Il report include i risultati preliminari emersi dallo studio Delphi.Riferimenti bibliografici
Amara, N. (2004). New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. Science Communication, 26(1), 75–106. http://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004267491
Belkhodja, O., Amara, N., Landry, R., & Ouimet, M. (2007). The Extent and Organizational Determinants of Research Utilization in Canadian Health Services Organizations. Science Communication, 28(3), 377–417. http://doi.org/10.1177/1075547006298486
Bertram M., Loncarevic N., Castellani T., Valente A., Gulis G. and Aro AR, How could we Start to Develop Indicators for Evidence-informed Policy Making in Public Health and Health Promotion?, HEALTH SYSTEMS AND POLICY RESEARCH, 2015 vol.2, N.1:16
Borrás, S. (2011). Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 725–734.
Castellani, T., & Valente, A. (2012). Democrazia e partecipazione: la metodologia Delphi. IRPPS Working Papers, 46.
Castellani T., Valente A., Cori L., Bianchi F., Detecting the use of evidence in a meta-policy, Evidence & Policy 2016, doi:10.1332/174426415X14430152798949.
Cunningham, D. H., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Policy Makers and Researchers Schooling Each Other: Lessons in Educational Policy from New York. Education, 8(3), 275–286.
De Goede, J., van Bon-Martens, M. J., Putters, K., & van Oers, H. A. (2012). Looking for interaction: quantitative measurement of research utilization by Dutch local health officials. Health Res Policy Syst, 10(9). Recuperato da http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1478-4505-10-9.pdf.
Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O., & Alberti, C. (2011). Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20476. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020476
Government of Canada, C. I. of H. R. (s.d.). More About Knowledge Translation at CIHR - CIHR. Recuperato 16 aprile 2014, from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/39033.html#Knowledge-Action
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? Journal of continuing education in the health professions, 26(1), 13–24.
Gupta, U. G., & Clarke, R. E. (1996). Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975–1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(2), 185 – 211. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00094-7
Hung, H.-L., Altschuld, J. W., & Lee, Y.-F. (2008). Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(2), 191–198.
Huzair, F., Borda-Rodriguez, A., Upton, M., & Mugwagwa, J. T. (2013). An interdisciplinary and development lens on knowledge translation. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 43–50. http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs119
Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Science Communication, 1(4), 537–578.
Kothari, A., Rudman, D., Dobbins, M., Rouse, M., Sibbald, S., & Edwards, N. (2012). The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: A qualitative study. Implementation Science, 7, 20.
Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N. (2003). The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 192–205.
Lavis, J. N., Ross, S. E., Hurley, J. E., Hohenadel, J. M., Stoddart, G. L., Woodward, C. A., & Abelson, J. (2002). Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. The Milbank Quarterly, 80(1), 125–154.
Lundvall, B.-Ä., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of industry studies, 1(2), 23–42.
Masser, I., & Foley, P. (1987). Delphi revisited: expert opinion in urban analysis. Urban Studies, 24(3), 217–225.
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard business review, 69(6), 96–104.
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. The Policy Press.
Pelz, D. C. (1978). Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy. Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view, 346–57.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension London. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pülzl, H., & Rametsteiner, E. (2009). Indicator development as ‘boundary spanning’between scientists and policy-makers. Science and Public Policy, 36(10), 743–752.
Rowe, G., Wright, G., & Bolger, F. (1991). Delphi: a reevaluation of research and theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 235–251.
Schlierf, K., & Meyer, M. (2013). Situating knowledge intermediation: Insights from science shops and knowledge brokers. Science and Public Policy, 40(4), 430–441. http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct034
Straus SE, Holroyd-Leduc J. Knowledge-to-action cycle. Evid Based Med. 2008;13(4):98-100.
Syed, A. M., Hjarnø, L., Krumkamp, R., Reintjes, R., & Aro, A. R. (2010). Developing policy options for SARS and SARS-like diseases–a Delphi study. Global public health, 5(6), 663–675.
Valente, A., Castellani, T., Larsen, M., Aro, A. (2015). Models and visions of science-policy interction: Remarks from a Delphi Study in Italy, Science and Public Policy, 42 (2): 228-241.
Valente, A., & Castellani, T. (2015). Metodologie qualitative: tra ricerca sociale, organizzazione delle conoscenze e partecipazione. In Cori L., Ballarini A., Linzalone N., Natali M., Bianchi F. (a cura di) La VIS in Italia - valutazione e partecipazione nelle decisioni su ambiente e salute, Arpa Emilia-Romagna, 2015. ISBN: 978-88-87854-39-8
Valente, A., & Luzi, D. (2000). Different contexts in electronic communication: Some remarks on the communicability of scientific knowledge. Journal of documentation, 56(3), 299–311.
Wehrens, R., Bekker, M., & Bal, R. (2011). Coordination of research, policy and practice: a case study of collaboration in the field of public health. Science and Public Policy, 38(10), 755–766.
Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public administration review, 39, 426–431.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
 | Questa licenza permette a terzi di riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire, recitare e modificare quest'opera, purché vengano citati l'autore e la fonte. Questa è la più ampia tra le licenze Creative Commons, rispetto alle libertà concesse a terzi sulle opere licenziate sotto attribuzione. |
